[lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week

Wed Oct 16 04:03:38 PDT 2019

Hi,

Is this monotonic incrementing identifier part of the email? I think
it would really complicate buildbot maintenance if we didn't have it
in obvious places. For instance, we have a (hacky) monitoring page for
our ARM/AArch64 buildbots [1] and it really helps a lot to just look
at the commit range for the last build to know if a fix actually
worked or not ("is the fix commit in that range? if not wait a bit
more before investigating"). Using just a git hash and having to
manually count commits would be a waste of time.

Just my 2c,
Diana

[1] http://llvm.validation.linaro.org/

On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 07:42, Shoaib Meenai via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I thought we were just going to count commits on a particular branch and use the (branch name, commit count) tuple as our monotonic incrementing identifier? https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#on-managing-revision-numbers-with-git
>
>
>
>
>
> From: cfe-dev <cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> Organization: Red Hat
> Reply-To: "tstellar at redhat.com" <tstellar at redhat.com>
> Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 at 10:13 PM
> To: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com>
> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org)" <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org>, LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Mailing list changes this week
>
>
>
> On 10/15/2019 09:44 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:33 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com <mailto:tstellar at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>      On 10/15/2019 09:24 PM, Mehdi AMINI wrote:
>
>      > Hi Tom.
>
>      >
>
>      > One issue with this is that we don't have a clear "ordering" from linear revision numbers from these emails. Have we looked into continuing to generate our own emails per commits instead so that we control the format?
>
>      >
>
>      This actually what we are doing, we are listening for github commit events and
>
>      then generating our own emails based on the data in the event.  We can format
>
>      the emails how ever we want, and we tried to match the current SVN format exactly.
>
> Ah great!
>
>
>
>      Is the some other information you would like to have in the emails to show the
>
>      ordering?
>
> The only thing I was looking to get was to continue to have a monotonic incrementing integer for the revision instead of the git hash alone: I don't know if `git llvm` has this feature yet but this was discussed a while ago (I don't remember if we just mentioned counting the commits in the repo from the beginning or using an invocation of `git describe` or something derived).
>
>
>
> We talked about using `git describe` for this, but this would require that we
>
> add tags to the master branch each time the version number was bumped.  We
>
> discussed this[1] last year, but deferred the decision, since we couldn't get
>
> consensus on the tag name.
>
>
>
> -Tom
>
>
>
> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_pipermail_llvm-2Ddev_2018-2DDecember_128484.html&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=p_75z-WV3dFcBRoqs2YeTexKxeCf8oyS-atIo6wG6Fg&e=
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mehdi
>
>
>
>      -Tom
>
>      > Thanks,
>
>      >
>
>      > --
>
>      > Mehdi
>
>      >
>
>      >
>
>      >
>
>      > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 9:07 PM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>>> wrote:
>
>      >
>
>      >     Hi,
>
>      >
>
>      >     We are going to start to switching from SVN commit emails to GitHub commit
>
>      >     emails this week.  The only real change you should notice is that
>
>      >     the revision number in the subject will be replaced with a git hash and
>
>      >     the diff links in the email will point to GitHub.  Otherwise the
>
>      >     content and format of the email should be the same.
>
>      >
>
>      >     We are going to start by rolling this out for the openmp-commits list
>
>      >     and then once that's working begin migrating the rest of the lists.  If you
>
>      >     notice any issues with the new emails, please file a bug and mark it
>
>      >     as a blocker of the github meta-bug (llvm.org/PR39393 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_PR39393&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=eX8PTSE7QycIi5KeESJj4VzteOcs9k7RANSWPgiiQ2Q&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_PR39393&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=eX8PTSE7QycIi5KeESJj4VzteOcs9k7RANSWPgiiQ2Q&e= >).
>
>      >
>
>      >     Thanks,
>
>      >     Tom
>
>      >     _______________________________________________
>
>      >     cfe-dev mailing list
>
>      >     cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
>
>      >     https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=xRFk9gEi6pLejTNAvlPR6gtikLoWNgyvL7b-TAvUcnc&e=
>
>      >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> cfe-dev mailing list
>
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=o3kDXzdBUE3ljQXKeTWOMw&m=_SmpuqSzuAhMoF3exJmWRp6KnerIOE6WdU4kcv3tjhQ&s=xRFk9gEi6pLejTNAvlPR6gtikLoWNgyvL7b-TAvUcnc&e=
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev