[lldb-dev] LLDB Website
Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 7 16:48:34 PDT 2019
Thanks Tanya! I can see the website was updated. I've added a timestamp to
the Sphinx configuration, but it doesn't show up on the website. I'm not
sure whether that's because I did something wrong or because the site is
still not generated post-commit.
Did you change anything to where the Doxygen is generated? I updated all
the links to remove the /html/ form the URL and put a redirect in place,
but now the cpp docs are back at their old location:
https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/html/index.html
Thank,
Jonas
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:08 PM Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote:
> Ok, I believe everything should be working. So the cpp ref and python ref
> are generated nightly. Sphinx/web is done post-commit. I just ran it by
> hand and you can see the script output:
> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/www-scripts/2019-May/007606.html
>
> Is it possible for you to add a timestamp to the bottom of the sphinx
> generated webpages? That would also make it easy to spot if it hasn’t run
> recently.
>
> If you aren’t seeing something updated, please let me know. If you add new
> targets, I have to do that manually as it's not automatic.
>
> Thanks,
> Tanya
>
>
> On May 7, 2019, at 9:28 AM, Jonas Devlieghere <jonas at devlieghere.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hey Tanya,
>
> That's great. I see the Python documentation is online now!
>
> Unfortunately it appears that the Sphinx part still isn't updating. I
> pushed a bunch of changes last week and none have made it to the homepage
> yet. I checked the www-scripts mailing list but I don't see any failures
> for LLDB. Do you know what's up here?
>
> Thanks,
> Jonas
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 12:19 AM Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Ignore this. svn wasn’t actually updating the src tree. It works! I just
>> need doxygen script to finish and it will be confirmed tonight.
>>
>>
>> -Tanya
>>
>> On May 6, 2019, at 11:55 PM, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> I’m not sure it is working. To clarify, nothing in LLVM should be
>> compiled to build the python docs correct?
>>
>> So I shouldn’t see this?
>> *Scanning dependencies of target liblldb_exports*
>> [ 0%] *Creating export file for liblldb*
>> [ 0%] Built target liblldb_exports
>> *Scanning dependencies of target LLVMDemangle*
>> [ 0%] Building CXX object
>> lib/Demangle/CMakeFiles/LLVMDemangle.dir/Demangle.cpp.o
>> [ 0%] Building CXX object
>> lib/Demangle/CMakeFiles/LLVMDemangle.dir/ItaniumDemangle.cpp.o
>> [ 0%] Building CXX object
>> lib/Demangle/CMakeFiles/LLVMDemangle.dir/MicrosoftDemangle.cpp.o
>> [ 0%] Building CXX object
>> lib/Demangle/CMakeFiles/LLVMDemangle.dir/MicrosoftDemangleNodes.cpp.o
>> [ 0%] *Linking CXX static library ../libLLVMDemangle.a*
>> [ 0%] Built target LLVMDemangle
>> *Scanning dependencies of target LLVMSupport*
>> [ 0%] Building CXX object
>> lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/AArch64TargetParser.cpp.o
>> [ 0%] Building CXX object
>> lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/ARMTargetParser.cpp.o
>> [ 0%] Building CXX object
>> lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/AMDGPUMetadata.cpp.o
>> [ 0%] Building CXX object
>> lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/APFloat.cpp.o
>> [ 0%] Building CXX object
>> lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/APInt.cpp.o
>>
>> Do I need any additional config options?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tanya
>>
>> On May 3, 2019, at 8:58 AM, Jonas Devlieghere <jonas at devlieghere.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Tanya,
>>
>> It appears the website is still stuck. It hasn't picked up my changes
>> from earlier this week. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to
>> help.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jonas
>>
>> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 10:40 PM Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I will give this a shot. I did remove the changes before to prevent any
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> -Tanya
>>>
>>> On Apr 29, 2019, at 10:26 AM, Jonas Devlieghere <jonas at devlieghere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've merged the aforementioned patch.
>>>
>>> Tanya, can you give generating the python docs another shot?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jonas
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 4:29 PM Jonas Devlieghere <jonas at devlieghere.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've put up a patch to make it possible to generate the python
>>>> reference without building lldb at all: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61216
>>>>
>>>> PS: The website isn't updating anymore, is that because of the python
>>>> reference generation?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:46 AM Ted Woodward <tedwood at quicinc.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That's the issue - lldb-python-doc depends on liblldb. From
>>>>> docs/CMakeLists.txt:
>>>>>
>>>>> if(EPYDOC_EXECUTABLE)
>>>>> find_program(DOT_EXECUTABLE dot)
>>>>> if(DOT_EXECUTABLE)
>>>>> set(EPYDOC_OPTIONS ${EPYDOC_OPTIONS} --graph all --dotpath
>>>>> ${DOT_EXECUTABLE})
>>>>> endif()
>>>>> set(DOC_DIR "${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/doc")
>>>>> file(MAKE_DIRECTORY "${DOC_DIR}")
>>>>> #set(ENV{PYTHONPATH}
>>>>> ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/../../../lib/python2.7/site-packages)
>>>>> add_custom_target(lldb-python-doc
>>>>> ${EPYDOC_EXECUTABLE}
>>>>> --html
>>>>> lldb
>>>>> -o ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/python_reference
>>>>> --name "LLDB python API"
>>>>> --url "http://lldb.llvm.org"
>>>>> ${EPYDOC_OPTIONS}
>>>>> DEPENDS swig_wrapper liblldb
>>>>> WORKING_DIRECTORY
>>>>> ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/../../../lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX}/python2.7/site-packages
>>>>> COMMENT "Generating LLDB Python API reference with epydoc"
>>>>> VERBATIM
>>>>> )
>>>>> endif(EPYDOC_EXECUTABLE)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>>> > From: lldb-dev <lldb-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Pavel
>>>>> Labath
>>>>> > via lldb-dev
>>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 1:16 AM
>>>>> > To: Jonas Devlieghere <jonas at devlieghere.com>; Tanya Lattner
>>>>> > <tanyalattner at llvm.org>
>>>>> > Cc: LLDB <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>>>> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB Website
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 24/04/2019 03:19, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:04 PM Jonas Devlieghere
>>>>> > > <jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com>> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:43 PM Tanya Lattner <
>>>>> tanyalattner at llvm.org
>>>>> > > <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>> wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >> On Apr 23, 2019, at 5:06 PM, Jonas Devlieghere
>>>>> > >> <jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:00 PM Tanya Lattner
>>>>> > >> <tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>> On Apr 23, 2019, at 11:54 AM, Jonas Devlieghere
>>>>> > >>> <jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com
>>>>> >>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> Hey Tanya,
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:51 Tanya Lattner
>>>>> > >>> <tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> Jonas,
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> Ignore what I said before as these do need to be
>>>>> > >>> separate targets. It appears the new targets are
>>>>> > >>> running doxygen. This isn’t something we
>>>>> typically do
>>>>> > >>> as a post commit hook since it takes awhile. I’ll
>>>>> > >>> need to do this via the doxygen nightly script.
>>>>> Any
>>>>> > >>> concerns?
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> That sounds perfect. Can we still do the regular
>>>>> website
>>>>> > >>> post commit?
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> Yes, so it will do docs-lldb-html on every commit.
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> Perfect!
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> So I am able to generate the cpp reference docs:
>>>>> > >> https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/index.html
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> However, the main website links to
>>>>> > >> https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/html/index.html.
>>>>> Do
>>>>> > >> you want the html in that url? I can change the
>>>>> alias. We
>>>>> > >> strip for other doxygen.
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> Let's keep it without the html. I'll update a link on the
>>>>> > >> website and add a redirect.
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> As for python docs, what is required to build those?
>>>>> It's
>>>>> > >> not showing up as a target for me.
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> This is probably because you don't have `epydoc` installed
>>>>> > >> (sudo pip install epydoc).
>>>>> > >> I think you'll have to re-run cmake after for it to pick
>>>>> it
>>>>> > >> up. The corresponding target should then be
>>>>> `lldb-python-doc`.
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/index.html
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Well installing epydoc did the trick, but I don’t think the
>>>>> > > doxygen script is the right place for this target. I have
>>>>> not
>>>>> > > dug into it yet but it appears to require some LLVM
>>>>> libraries
>>>>> > > and is building those. I’m letting it finish to verify it
>>>>> builds
>>>>> > > but I’ll have to sort out the best way of doing this on the
>>>>> > > server. We have other scripts that generate other
>>>>> documentation
>>>>> > > that build parts of LLVM. Ideally, I would want to
>>>>> leverage that
>>>>> > > and reduce build times.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Yeah, the annoying thing about the Python documentation is
>>>>> that it
>>>>> > > builds the C++ API, then runs swig to generate the Python
>>>>> wrapper,
>>>>> > > and finally generates the docs from that.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It should be possible to solve this by tweaking the dependency graph
>>>>> a bit.
>>>>> > There's no fundamental reason why you need to build anything in
>>>>> order to
>>>>> > run swig. It is purely a textual step -- it ingests header files and
>>>>> interface
>>>>> > definitions and spits out python and cpp files. The inputs are
>>>>> present as static
>>>>> > checked in source, so the swig step could theoretically be the very
>>>>> first build
>>>>> > command that we run.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > I wonder if we can just use the static bindings that are
>>>>> checked-in
>>>>> > > instead. I will look into that later today/tomorrow.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Right, so the reason is that we don't have the static bindings on
>>>>> > > llvm.org <http://llvm.org> (we have them for swift-lldb on
>>>>> GitHub).
>>>>> > > Maybe we should check them in upstream too? That's something the
>>>>> > > community will have to weigh in on...
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I think it would be good to avoid that...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > pl
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > lldb-dev mailing list
>>>>> > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>>> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20190507/8a6ed6a8/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the lldb-dev
mailing list