[lldb-dev] LLDB Website
Tanya Lattner via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 1 22:40:09 PDT 2019
I will give this a shot. I did remove the changes before to prevent any issue.
-Tanya
> On Apr 29, 2019, at 10:26 AM, Jonas Devlieghere <jonas at devlieghere.com> wrote:
>
> I've merged the aforementioned patch.
>
> Tanya, can you give generating the python docs another shot?
>
> Thanks,
> Jonas
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 4:29 PM Jonas Devlieghere <jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com>> wrote:
> I've put up a patch to make it possible to generate the python reference without building lldb at all: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61216 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61216>
>
> PS: The website isn't updating anymore, is that because of the python reference generation?
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:46 AM Ted Woodward <tedwood at quicinc.com <mailto:tedwood at quicinc.com>> wrote:
> That's the issue - lldb-python-doc depends on liblldb. From docs/CMakeLists.txt:
>
> if(EPYDOC_EXECUTABLE)
> find_program(DOT_EXECUTABLE dot)
> if(DOT_EXECUTABLE)
> set(EPYDOC_OPTIONS ${EPYDOC_OPTIONS} --graph all --dotpath ${DOT_EXECUTABLE})
> endif()
> set(DOC_DIR "${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/doc")
> file(MAKE_DIRECTORY "${DOC_DIR}")
> #set(ENV{PYTHONPATH} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/../../../lib/python2.7/site-packages)
> add_custom_target(lldb-python-doc
> ${EPYDOC_EXECUTABLE}
> --html
> lldb
> -o ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/python_reference
> --name "LLDB python API"
> --url "http://lldb.llvm.org <http://lldb.llvm.org/>"
> ${EPYDOC_OPTIONS}
> DEPENDS swig_wrapper liblldb
> WORKING_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/../../../lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX}/python2.7/site-packages
> COMMENT "Generating LLDB Python API reference with epydoc" VERBATIM
> )
> endif(EPYDOC_EXECUTABLE)
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lldb-dev <lldb-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org>> On Behalf Of Pavel Labath
> > via lldb-dev
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 1:16 AM
> > To: Jonas Devlieghere <jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com>>; Tanya Lattner
> > <tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>>
> > Cc: LLDB <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB Website
> >
> > On 24/04/2019 03:19, Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:04 PM Jonas Devlieghere
> > > <jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com> <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com>>> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:43 PM Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>
> > > <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>>> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Apr 23, 2019, at 5:06 PM, Jonas Devlieghere
> > >> <jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com> <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com>>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:00 PM Tanya Lattner
> > >> <tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org> <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On Apr 23, 2019, at 11:54 AM, Jonas Devlieghere
> > >>> <jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com> <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com <mailto:jonas at devlieghere.com>>>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hey Tanya,
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:51 Tanya Lattner
> > >>> <tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org> <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org <mailto:tanyalattner at llvm.org>>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Jonas,
> > >>>
> > >>> Ignore what I said before as these do need to be
> > >>> separate targets. It appears the new targets are
> > >>> running doxygen. This isn’t something we typically do
> > >>> as a post commit hook since it takes awhile. I’ll
> > >>> need to do this via the doxygen nightly script. Any
> > >>> concerns?
> > >>>
> > >>> That sounds perfect. Can we still do the regular website
> > >>> post commit?
> > >>
> > >> Yes, so it will do docs-lldb-html on every commit.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Perfect!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> So I am able to generate the cpp reference docs:
> > >> https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/index.html <https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/index.html>
> > >>
> > >> However, the main website links to
> > >> https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/html/index.html <https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/html/index.html>. Do
> > >> you want the html in that url? I can change the alias. We
> > >> strip for other doxygen.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Let's keep it without the html. I'll update a link on the
> > >> website and add a redirect.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> As for python docs, what is required to build those? It's
> > >> not showing up as a target for me.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> This is probably because you don't have `epydoc` installed
> > >> (sudo pip install epydoc).
> > >> I think you'll have to re-run cmake after for it to pick it
> > >> up. The corresponding target should then be `lldb-python-doc`.
> > >>
> > >> https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/index.html <https://lldb.llvm.org/cpp_reference/index.html>
> > >
> > > Well installing epydoc did the trick, but I don’t think the
> > > doxygen script is the right place for this target. I have not
> > > dug into it yet but it appears to require some LLVM libraries
> > > and is building those. I’m letting it finish to verify it builds
> > > but I’ll have to sort out the best way of doing this on the
> > > server. We have other scripts that generate other documentation
> > > that build parts of LLVM. Ideally, I would want to leverage that
> > > and reduce build times.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, the annoying thing about the Python documentation is that it
> > > builds the C++ API, then runs swig to generate the Python wrapper,
> > > and finally generates the docs from that.
> >
> > It should be possible to solve this by tweaking the dependency graph a bit.
> > There's no fundamental reason why you need to build anything in order to
> > run swig. It is purely a textual step -- it ingests header files and interface
> > definitions and spits out python and cpp files. The inputs are present as static
> > checked in source, so the swig step could theoretically be the very first build
> > command that we run.
> >
> > > I wonder if we can just use the static bindings that are checked-in
> > > instead. I will look into that later today/tomorrow.
> > >
> > >
> > > Right, so the reason is that we don't have the static bindings on
> > > llvm.org <http://llvm.org/> <http://llvm.org <http://llvm.org/>> (we have them for swift-lldb on GitHub).
> > > Maybe we should check them in upstream too? That's something the
> > > community will have to weigh in on...
> > >
> >
> > I think it would be good to avoid that...
> >
> > pl
> > _______________________________________________
> > lldb-dev mailing list
> > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev <https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20190501/5aa0897d/attachment.html>
More information about the lldb-dev
mailing list