[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [Github] RFC: linear history vs merge commits

[David Greene via lldb-dev]

Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes:

> What is the practical plan to enforce the lack of merges? When we
> looked into this GitHub would not support this unless also forcing
> every change to go through a pull request (i.e. no pre-receive hooks
> on direct push to master were possible). Did this change? Are we
> hoping to get support from GitHub on this?
>
> We may write this rule in the developer guide, but I fear it'll be
> hard to enforce in practice.

Again, changes aren't going through git yet, right?  Not until SVN is
decommissioned late this year (or early next).  SVN requires a strict
linear history so it handles the enforcement for now.

My personal opinion is that when SVN is decomissioned we should use pull
requests, simply because that's what's familiar to the very large
development community outside LLVM.  It will lower the bar to entry for
new contributors.  This has all sorts of implications we need to discuss
of course, but we have some time to do that.

If we don't use PRs, then we're pretty much on the honor system to
disallow merges AFAIK.

                             -David