[lldb-dev] increase timeout for tests?

[Pavel Labath via lldb-dev]

Aha, in that case, it definitely sounds like increasing the timeout is in
order. I would still go for something less than 30 minutes, but I don't
care about that much. I may just export LLDB_TEST_TIMEOUT locally to lower
it if tests taking long to time out start bugging me.

BTW, do you know which test is that? Is it one of the tests I have listed
in one of the previous emails?

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 at 14:52, Davide Italiano <dccitaliano at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote:
> > I think we should get some data before pulling numbers out of our
> sleeves.
> > If we can get some numbers on the slowest machine that we have around,
> then
> > we should be able to specify the timeout as some multiple of the slowest
> > test. For example, for me the slowest test takes around 110 seconds. The
> > timeout is 4 minutes (~ 2x) and I don't get tests timing out. How long
> does
> > the slowest test take for you? If we set the timeout as 3x or 4x that
> > number, we should create a sufficiently large buffer and still avoid
> > half-hour waits.
> >
>
> The longest test takes over 300 seconds. This is a late 2013 Mac Pro,
> so, definitely not the newest machine out there (but also something
> fairly high spec).
> For the archives, my conf is something like; cmake -GNinja ../llvm &&
> ninja check-lldb
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Davide
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20180313/e02f26b8/attachment.html>