[lldb-dev] Bot failure with new "in tree compiler" changes (r316728) in llvm.org bot
Ted Woodward via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Nov 7 10:36:26 PST 2017
We had the same problem internally on our bots. A clean build blew away the cmake caches and fixed the problem.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Don Hinton via lldb-dev
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2017 12:28 PM
To: Jim Ingham <jingham at apple.com>
Cc: LLDB <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Bot failure with new "in tree compiler" changes (r316728) in llvm.org bot
I hit the same problem last week. I ended up blowing away my build directory, and the problem went away.
Probably a cache issue, but I was unable to reproduce...
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> > wrote:
The lldb_cmake GreenDragon bot is now failing, e.g.:
This looks related to Pavel's change:
> r316728 | labath | 2017-10-26 19:24:04 -0700 (Thu, 26 Oct 2017) | 18 lines
> Default to using in-tree clang for building test executables
> Using the in-tree clang should be the default test configuration as that
> is the one compiler that we can be sure everyone has (better
> reproducibility of test results). Also, it should hopefully reduce the
> impact of pr35040.
> This also reduces the number of settings which control the compiler
> used. LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER is used for C files and
> LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER for C++ files. Both of the settings default to
> the in-tree clang.
> Reviewers: zturner
> Subscribers: mgorny, davide, lldb-commits
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39215
The error is:
CMake Error at tools/lldb/CMakeLists.txt:78 (message):
LLDB test compilers not specified. Tests will not run
Does the bot need to be reconfigured for these changes?
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lldb-dev