[lldb-dev] RFC: Break/Watchpoint refactor
Sean Callanan via lldb-dev
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 27 15:13:05 PDT 2016
Doing it everywhere would be a public service IMO. I don't like macros either.
Sean
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> FWIW LLVM removed all it's disallow copy / assign macros in favor of explicitly writing it. I agree it's easier to just change the macro, but I would just do what LLVM does as long as you don't mind the extra work.
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 3:01 PM Daniel Austin Noland via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
>
> On 09/27/2016 03:37 PM, Enrico Granata wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Daniel Austin Noland via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> * Prefer explicitly deleted copy ctor / assignments over multiline macro DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN
>>
>>
>> Why not just move DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN over to using =delete ? That seems like a trivial change..
>
> That was my first thought as well. Still, I personally try to avoid macros. On the other hand that one is simple enough that it may be justified.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Enrico
>> 📩 egranata@.com ☎️ 27683
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20160927/2cbe05b8/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the lldb-dev
mailing list