[lldb-dev] LLDB Evolution: Next Phase

[Kate Stone via lldb-dev]

This has been in the works long enough to get plans together.  If the current state of a bot suggests that manual validation is required then that’s what I’d recommend.  That’s the unfortunate current state of affairs with the Green Dragon bots, for example.

Kate Stone k8stone at apple.com <mailto:k8stone at apple.com>
 Xcode Low Level Tools

> On Sep 6, 2016, at 5:06 AM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> On 3 September 2016 at 00:30, Kate Stone via lldb-dev
> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> As a reminder, any pending commits you might have planned for LLDB this
>> weekend must not break any of the bots we’re using to validate the health of
>> the source tree.
> 
> Given the current non-functional state of the bots, what is the plan
> for proceeding with the formatting change? For FreeBSD the bot was
> building lldb but not running the tests and I was planning to manually
> validate the tests.
> 
> For reference at r280675 on my FreeBSD desktop there are a few tests
> that report errors (the libstdcpp ones, as FreeBSD 10 and later use
> libc++), two that abort with an assertion ("Breakpoint update
> failed!"), and three that sometimes time out (test_asm_int_3,
> test_iter_registers_dwarf, test_with_dsym_and_python_api_dwarf).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20160906/a4bb97bd/attachment-0001.html>