[lldb-dev] Bug fixes for release_38 branch

Francis Ricci via lldb-dev lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 3 10:04:05 PDT 2016


I didn't have any luck with r266423, these dwarf issues can get pretty
tricky.

Ok, that makes sense. We've been using these commits on top of our
release_38 branch for several weeks now, and I'm happy with their
stability. I'll continue to be on the lookout for bugs and bug-fixes.

Hans, can we get these commits cherry-picked onto release_38?

Thanks!
Francis

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:40 AM Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote:

> As Tamas said, little effort has gone into the to stabilization of the
> 3.8 branch. Right now, you're the only one looking into it, so I think
> we'll just defer to your judgement. It is a bit of a duplication of
> effort but, I think it is very worthwhile for lldb project as a whole.
>
> For the multithreaded dwarf parsing thing, if you are feeling
> adventurous, you might want to try if r266423 fixes your problems, but
> I think the idea of reverting that part is very reasonable as well.
>
> pl
>
>
> On 29 April 2016 at 19:03, Francis Ricci via lldb-dev
> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > I needed to have a (recent) branch of lldb which was stable for debugging
> > across platforms (native darwin, native linux, android, etc). I
> originally
> > tried using the google/stable branch (which I assume is what ships with
> > Android Studio), but that had some crashes with darwin debugging. I had
> > assumed that the branch shipped with xcode was a private release branch.
> > Since using either google/stable or release_38 would require
> stabilization,
> > I decided that going ahead and stabilizing release_38 would probably be
> > worthwhile. I assume that this would be beneficial for non-developers who
> > use lldb outside of xcode/android studio as well, given that they may
> > install the linux package for the most recent stable release branch.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 5:28 AM Tamas Berghammer <tberghammer at google.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there any reason you want to use the release_38 branch specifically?
> As
> >> far as I know nobody tested it or using it in the LLDB community so it
> is
> >> approximately as good as any random commit on master. If you are
> looking for
> >> a reasonably stable LLDB then I think you are better off with asking
> for the
> >> version number shipped with xcode or with Android Studio as those
> versions
> >> are a bit more tested and it is used by some users as well.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:57 PM Francis Ricci via lldb-dev
> >> <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Over the last month or two, I've been working to stabilize the
> release_38
> >>> branch of lldb, and there are commits which fix bugs on this branch
> that I'd
> >>> like to cherry-pick down. They're listed at the bottom of this message.
> >>>
> >>> One thing to note - r251106 is a commit I'd like to revert, instead of
> a
> >>> cherry-pick. When we use this commit (multithreaded dwarf parsing) on
> the
> >>> 3.8 branch, I run into a lot of dwarf assertion failures, even after
> >>> cherry-picking all the dwarf fixes I could find from master. I don't
> see
> >>> these assertion failures on master, so it's definitely an issue that's
> been
> >>> fixed since the branch cut, but I think the best solution for the
> release_38
> >>> branch is to disable it for now.
> >>>
> >>> r264810 will have a small merge conflict due to an indentation change
> in
> >>> lldbpexpect.py
> >>> r263735 will have a small merge conflict due to a whitespace change on
> >>> master. Everything else should apply cleanly.
> >>>
> >>> Commits:
> >>> r267741 Use absolute module path when possible if sent in svr4 packets
> >>> r264810 Fixed the failing test TestCommandScriptImmediateOutput on
> MacOSX
> >>> r267468 Maintain register numbering across xml include features
> >>> r267467 Properly unload modules from target image list when using svr4
> >>> packets
> >>> r267466 Use Process Plugin register indices when communicating with
> >>> remote
> >>> r267463 Store absolute path for lldb executable in dotest.py
> >>> r267462 Create _lldb python symlink correctly when LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX
> is
> >>> used
> >>> r265422 Fix dotest.py '-p' option for multi-process mode
> >>> r265420 Print environment when dumping arch triple
> >>> r265419 Make sure to update Target arch if environment changed
> >>> r265418 Allow gdbremote process to read modules from memory
> >>> r264476 Fix FILE * leak in Python API
> >>> r264351 Make File option flags consistent for Python API
> >>> r263824 Fixed a bug where DW_AT_start_scope would fall through to
> >>> DW_AT_artificial in SymbolFileDWARF::ParseVariableDIE(). This was
> caught by
> >>> the clang warning that catches unannotated case fall throughs.
> >>> r263735 Fix deadlock due to thread list locking in 'bt all' with obj-c
> >>> r261858 Handle the case when a variable is only valid in part of the
> >>> enclosing scope
> >>> r261598 Fixed a problem where the DWARF for inline functions was
> >>> mis-parsed.
> >>> r261279 Make sure code that is in the middle of figuring out the
> correct
> >>> architecture on attach uses the architecture it has figured out,
> rather than
> >>> the Target's architecture, which may not have been updated to the
> correct
> >>> value yet.
> >>> r260626 Don't crash if we have a DIE that has a DW_AT_ranges attribute
> >>> and yet the SymbolFileDWARF doesn't have a DebugRanges. If this happens
> >>> print a nice error message to prompt the user to file a bug and attach
> the
> >>> offending DWARF file so we can get the correct compiler fixed.
> >>> r260618 Removed a bad assertion:
> >>> r260322 Added code that was commented out during testing to stops
> >>> template member functions from being added to class definitions (see
> >>> revision 260308 for details).
> >>> r260308 Fixed many issues that were causing differing type definition
> >>> issues to show up when parsing expressions.
> >>> r259962 Fix "thread backtrace -s": option was misparsed because of a
> >>> missing break.
> >>> r258367 Fix a problem where we were not calling fcntl() with the
> correct
> >>> arguments for F_DUPFD
> >>> r257786 Fixed a crasher when dealing with table entries that have blank
> >>> names.
> >>> r257644 Fix an issue where scripted commands would not actually print
> any
> >>> of their output if an immediate output file was set in the result
> object via
> >>> a Python file object
> >>> REVERT - r251106 Re-commit "Make dwarf parsing multi-threaded"
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> lldb-dev mailing list
> >>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lldb-dev mailing list
> > lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20160503/3eb4cf3e/attachment.html>


More information about the lldb-dev mailing list