[lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] GitHub anyone?

[Chris Lattner via lldb-dev]

> On Jun 2, 2016, at 11:42 AM, via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, I get that and I actually don't mind keeping a linear history.
> But we definitely should branch for release.  Given release branches,
> there are a number of questions and tradeoffs about how to backport
> changes from master/latest development to a release.  Some of those
> options break linear history.  This is the kind of workflow stuff we
> should clarify if possible.

+1 for branching for official llvm.org releases, and each branch should have its own linear history (from its branch point).

I don’t think we want people’s random projects and development branches on llvm.org.  They can clone to repo off to their own fork on github and do what they want there.

-Chris