[lldb-dev] Add support for OCaml native debugging

[Zachary Turner via lldb-dev]

I don't like the idea of not having tests. Promising tests and actually
delivering on them are two entirely different things. And without them, we
just end up with broken code and nobody to maintain it
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 6:23 AM Tamas Berghammer via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> What type of binaries do you want to commit in?
>
> Generally we don't like putting binaries to the repository because they
> are not human readable so it is hard to review/diff them and they will only
> run on a single platform and a single architecture while we support a lot
> of different configuration.
>
> Tamas
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:26 PM E BOUTALEB via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> I would like to submit two patches for code review.
>> They introduce concrete support for OCaml native debugging, granted that
>> you have access to the native compiler with DWARF emission support (see
>> https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/574)
>>
>> This adds about 2000 lines of code.
>> The type system isn't particularly complex here, every value is
>> considered as an unsigned integer, and interpretation of the value is left
>> to an external debugging layer made in OCaml.
>> The language plugin handles function name demangling for breakpoints too.
>>
>> No tests for now. Is it fine to commit binaries with the patchs?
>>
>> Elias Boutaleb
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20160707/201207df/attachment.html>