[lldb-dev] marking new summary output for expected timeouts

[Pavel Labath via lldb-dev]

Hi,

I have removed all of our expected timeouts from dosep.py (there are
still some freebsd and darwin ones left, but I don't know If anyone is
looking at those), so I think we're not using any part of the old test
runner at the moment. All clear for removal on our part.

pl


On 14 December 2015 at 16:06, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh yeah, that's fine.  I won't take that code out.
>
> Hmm at least some of the builds went through this weekend, I made a number
> of changes Saturday morning (US Pacific time) that I saw go through the
> Ubuntu 14.04 cmake bot.
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we've had an unrelated breaking change, so the buildbots were red over
>> the weekend. I've fixed it now, and it seems to be turning green.
>> We've also had power outage during the weekend and not all of the
>> buildbots are back up yet, as we need to wait for MTV to wake up. I'd
>> like to give this at least one more day, to give them a chance to
>> stabilize. Is this blocking you from making further changes to the
>> test event system?
>>
>> pl
>>
>> On 12 December 2015 at 00:20, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey Pavel and/or Tamas,
>> >
>> > Let me know when we're definitely all clear on the expected timeout
>> > support
>> > I added to the (now once again) newer default test results.
>> >
>> > As soon as we don't need the legacy summary results anymore, I'm going
>> > to
>> > strip out the code that manages it.  It is quite messy and duplicates
>> > the
>> > content that is better handled by the test event system.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > -Todd
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I went ahead and added the expected timeout support in r255363.
>> >>
>> >> I'm going to turn back on the new BasicResultsFormatter as the default.
>> >> We can flip this back off if it is still not doing everything we need,
>> >> but I
>> >> *think* we cover the issue you saw now.
>> >>
>> >> -Todd
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Pavel,
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm going to adjust the new summary output for expected timeouts.  I
>> >>> hope
>> >>> to do that in the next hour or less.  I'll put that in and flip the
>> >>> default
>> >>> back on for using the new summary output.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll do those two changes separately, so you can revert the flip back
>> >>> on
>> >>> to flip it back off if we still have an issue.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sound good?
>> >>>
>> >>> (This can be orthogonal to the new work to mark up expected timeouts).
>> >>> --
>> >>> -Todd
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -Todd
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > -Todd
>
>
>
>
> --
> -Todd