[lldb-dev] Patch for addressing format warnings on 32-bit

[Greg Clayton via lldb-dev]

Please do cast to 64 bit and user PRI*64 macros. %z isn't supported on all platforms and we need to get away from using it.

> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:32 AM, William Dillon via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Todd,
> 
> The example I put in my last email is one of a few (maybe one more) instances where the existing code casts to 64-bit and uses PRIu64.  When I’m dabbling in existing code I try to copy the conventions that are already in place, so that’s why I went this way.  I’m happy to change it to %zu.  I was just checking about that.
> 
> - Will
> 
>> On Dec 28, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi William,
>> 
>> It looks like just the PRIx64/PRIu64 bits are needed from a visual inspection.  The source variables that are printed from already are 64-bit always, aren't they?  If they're not but they should be, that seems like the real underlying problem rather than needing to cast.
>> 
>> What kind of warning are you seeing if you just replace the % format specifier?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> -Todd
>> 
>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 12:32 PM, William Dillon via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> > Message: 1
>> > Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:15:53 +0100
>> > From: Joerg Sonnenberger via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> > To: lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Patch for addressing format warnings on 32-bit
>> > Message-ID: <20151226201553.GB14119 at britannica.bec.de>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 06:34:09PM -0800, William Dillon via lldb-dev wrote:
>> >> There are a handful of -Wformat warnings on 32-bit platforms.
>> >> I addressed all those that I’ve seen while working on Swift.
>> >> Let me know if the git diff format is inappropriate for this.
>> >
>> > Don't cast size_t to uint64_t, format it with %zu directly.
>> >
>> > Joerg
>> >
>> 
>> I can go ahead and do that, but I wonder whether there should be two different ways of handling this, even on the same line.  For example:
>> 
>> -            error.SetErrorStringWithFormat ("SoftwareBreakpointr::%s addr=0x%" PRIx64 ": tried to read %lu bytes but only read %" PRIu64, __FUNCTION__, m_addr, m_opcode_size, (uint64_t)bytes_read);
>> +            error.SetErrorStringWithFormat ("SoftwareBreakpointr::%s addr=0x%" PRIx64 ": tried to read %" PRIu64 " bytes but only read %" PRIu64, __FUNCTION__, m_addr, (uint64_t)m_opcode_size, (uint64_t)bytes_read);
>> 
>> - Will
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> -Todd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev