[lldb-dev] First hand support for musl-libc

[Hans Wennborg via lldb-dev]

I've merged r277997, r277999 and r278001 to 3.9 in r278540.

Cheers,
Hans

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do run a basic set of tests (compile+run test suite) on linux from
> time to time, but unfortunately I don't have time to be more active in
> this. I have just completed the test on the release branch with these
> changes cherry-picked and it seems to working fine. But I certainly
> agree that the release branch could use more testing.
>
> Actually, upon closer examination, we should be able to drop one
> commit from the list - r278000 - it was just a followup cleanup to the
> previous two, and the fourth commit I mentioned still applies cleanly
> without it.
>
> cheers,
> pl
>
>
> On 11 August 2016 at 19:41, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote:
>>> On 10 August 2016 at 22:34, Dangling Pointer
>>> <danglingpointer at outlook.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks Pavel! I see the changes made in master branch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By any change can these be back-ported to release38 and 39 branches? Since
>>>> llvm38 is the one aports is offering.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think the 3.8 ship has sailed, but there still may be a chance to
>>> get it into 3.9.
>>>
>>> Hans, what do you make of that? (The relevant changes are r277997,
>>> r277999, r278000, r278001)
>>>
>>> Presumably the right approver would be Oleksiy (also in cc).
>>
>> The patches seem fine to me. The one thing I'm worried about is
>> whether anyone is testing this stuff on the branch?