[lldb-dev] top-of-tree build failure when using configure on Linux?

[Todd Fiala via lldb-dev]

Hey Sylvestre,

On the Debian side, are we still counting on Makefile support for
distribution building?

-Todd

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Bruce Mitchener <bruce.mitchener at gmail.com>
wrote:

> There were 2 changes made this week that broke both the cmake and one that
> broke the Makefile builds.  I checked in fixes for the cmake build, but no
> one has done similar for the Makefile build (as far as I've noticed).
> (Notably, there's no Makefile support for
> source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang.)
>
> If we're going to leave that broken, maybe we could, instead, be the
> pioneers in LLVM-land and remove the Makefile-based build system instead.
> It doesn't seem like any of the people doing steady work on LLDB use it.
>
>  - Bruce
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev <
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> We forced a clean build because it wasn’t picking up an enum change that
>> affected the swig python bindings, and the objective c problem popped up.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve built with cmake on that machine, and it worked. I think the right
>> answer is switch to cmake.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>>
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
>> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Zachary Turner [mailto:zturner at google.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 03, 2015 12:42 PM
>> *To:* Todd Fiala; Ted Woodward
>> *Cc:* LLDB
>> *Subject:* Re: [lldb-dev] top-of-tree build failure when using configure
>> on Linux?
>>
>>
>>
>> Can you change it to CMake instead of configure?  I know that's not what
>> you want to hear, but the configure build is on its way out, so you're
>> going to have to do this at some point anyway.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:25 AM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev <
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> I haven't seen that one myself.  Are you still seeing it?
>>
>>
>>
>> Is it possible the buildbot's commands are possibly using older/stale
>> object files?  Is distcc/ccache involved?  Does the build force a clean
>> build?  If not, does the issue go away on a clean build?  Is it
>> configure-based or cmake based?
>>
>>
>>
>> Just some thoughts.  Good luck resolving!
>>
>>
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev <
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Our Ubuntu 14.10 buildbot at
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10 is failing,
>> and I’ve been tasked to fix it because I’m the LLDB guy.
>>
>>
>>
>> It fails with things like:
>>
>> /var/lib/buildbot/slaves/hexagon-build-03/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.10/llvm.obj/Release+Asserts/lib/libclangCodeGen.a(BackendUtil.o):
>> In function `addObjCARCOptPass(llvm::PassManagerBuilder const&,
>> llvm::legacy::PassManagerBase&)':
>>
>> BackendUtil.cpp:(.text._ZL17addObjCARCOptPassRKN4llvm18PassManagerBuilderERNS_6legacy15PassManagerBaseE+0x21):
>> undefined reference to `llvm::createObjCARCOptPass()'
>>
>>
>>
>> I get the same error when I manually build using the same steps as the
>> bot, but when I use cmake it works.
>>
>>
>>
>> Has anyone seen this behavior using configure?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>>
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
>> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>
>>
>


-- 
-Todd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150904/5ff613e2/attachment.html>