[lldb-dev] correct event sequence on process detach

[Greg Clayton via lldb-dev]

I am fine with case "a".

Greg

> On Sep 28, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> The following question came up while fixing up handling of process detach.
> 
> when detaching from a running process, on some platforms LLDB needs to
> stop it first. Is this stop something that should be hidden from the
> public view or not?
> 
> I.e. if the process state is Running, and I do a process.Detach(),
> what is the correct sequence of public state transitions one should
> observe:
> a) Running -> Detached ?
> 
> b) (Running -> Stopped -> Detached) or (Running -> Detached),
> depending on whether the platform performs the maintenance stop?
> 
> My feeling is it should be a), but I wanted to double check first.
> 
> pl