[lldb-dev] if you look at binding-generation-as-service element...

[Zachary Turner via lldb-dev]

Err, links aren't showing up for me.  Gonna try this again.

lldb.py   -
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzpf8QJC6OGOaEVaNF9GY0tPXzg/view?usp=sharing
LLDBWrapPython.cpp    -
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzpf8QJC6OGOaEVaNF9GY0tPXzg/view?usp=sharing


On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:19 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:

> LLDBWrapPython.cpp
> lldb.py
>
> Double check the top of lldb.py to make sure swig_version = (3,0,x)
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:14 PM Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sure.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Can I send you a sample set of bindings generated by 3.x as a fail-fast
>>> test?  Try them out, see if anything breaks, etc?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:07 PM Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Zachary,
>>>>
>>>> Please make sure to ping Greg Clayton, particularly if it does anything
>>>> that would make the binding no longer be C-linkage-compatible.  He can tell
>>>> you all the bits we are counting on.  I think the keys are:
>>>>
>>>> * we don't ever have there be vtables.
>>>> * we never remove API surface area.
>>>> * we don't change signatures of existing API.
>>>>
>>>> but I don't think that's exhaustive and certainly not authoritative.
>>>>
>>>> Anyways, just make sure you sync up with him so you don't end up
>>>> wasting any energy on something that will break some kind of requirement we
>>>> have.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> --
>>>> -Todd
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Todd
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20151118/dd241cb0/attachment-0001.html>