[lldb-dev] LLDB-4.7 always starts server on Linux

[Vince Harron]

> does it still work?

We just checked and 50% of the tests are failing.

In fact, we've just removed this code from the tree.  This is exactly the
way OSX debugs local processes.  Now all OSX/iOS/Android/Linux local/Linux
remote all share the most code possible.


On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Eugene Birukov <eugenebi at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for info. Still, is there a way to force the old behavior on Linux?
> I am creating a C++ program that does not involve starting command
> interpreter, and apparently I mess up LLDB state somewhere.  Now,
> looking at one state machine in a single process is much easier that
> looking at two interconnected state machines in two different processes.
>
> I found platform.plugin.linux.use-llgs-for-local setting - does it still
> work?
>
> Thanks,
> Eugene
>
> > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB-4.7 always starts server on Linux
> > From: gclayton at apple.com
> > Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:12:29 -0700
> > CC: lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > To: eugenebi at hotmail.com
> >
> > This is the new way forward. Why is it better? Because it will ensure
> that remote debugging is just as good as local debugging. Otherwise remote
> debugging is something no one ever plays with and when people use it it
> doesn't work very well. It also means if something serious goes wrong, it
> can stop lldb itself from crashing and keeps LLDB out of the signal chain
> and many other things that can be beneficial when spawning child processes.
> >
> > Is there a reason you want the old behavior back?
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > > On Jun 26, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Eugene Birukov <eugenebi at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > When I run lldb-4.6 that I apt-get on my Ubuntu 14.04 box, it runs as
> a single process directly monitoring the target. When I run lldb-4.7 that I
> built from sources, it starts lldb-server. Is this a legitimate policy
> change or I miss some configuration option? I mean, is it possible to run
> lldb-4.7 as a single process - the way 4.6 does?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eugene
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > lldb-dev mailing list
> > > lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150626/ece35ad7/attachment.html>