[lldb-dev] CMake & BUILD_SHARED_LIBS

Andrew Wilkins axwalk at gmail.com
Mon Jun 1 01:16:29 PDT 2015

On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 16:01 Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote:

> Le 01/06/2015 09:55, Andrew Wilkins a écrit :
>  On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 at 11:06 Vince Harron < <vince at nethacker.com>
> vince at nethacker.com> wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>  We're not testing that configuration so I'm not surprised that you're
>> hitting problems.  I'd like to look into it but we're working towards a
>> release now and this isn't the most critical issue.  For today, I recommend
>> building without this flag.
>  No worries. When would be a good time to ping back? I was hoping to get
> the packaging updated for 3.7, but that may be too aggressive, and not
> leave enough time for bug fixing.
>  Also, in case I wasn't clear: I have changes ready, I just thought it
> might be polite to bring it up here first, since I've not contributed
> before. Building without the flag isn't really an option for Debian
> packaging. The autotools-based build already links LLDB libs against
> libLLVM.so, and it would be best to preserve that.
>   Yep, I confirm that it is needed to move the Debian & Ubuntu packages
> from autotools to cmake.
> For now, I have an important number of undefined symbols.
> Could you send your patch? I would be happy to test that.

Sure, I've just uploaded it to Phabricator: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10157.

Vince, please feel free to ignore that one for now, as you're busy. I don't
want to disrupt anyone's work.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150601/de5e3b21/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list