[lldb-dev] Slew of new failures in Linux, caused by llvm

[Zachary Turner]

Yea theres 886, 888, 889, and 890. I think all would have to be reverted.
Is anyone on #llvm IRC that can help?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:25 PM Vince Harron <vharron at google.com> wrote:

> IIRC I used
>
> llvm$ svn diff --revision 228885:228886 > ~/break.diff
>
> llvm$ patch -p0 -R < ~/break.diff
>
> Some hunks failed.  Could've messed something up.
> On Feb 12, 2015 6:20 PM, "Zachary Turner" <zturner at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm I checked the logs, that file hasn't been touched since that
>> revision. What's unclean about the revert? Compile failure, or other test
>> failure?
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:13 PM Vince Harron <vharron at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It doesn't revert cleanly
>>> On Feb 12, 2015 6:11 PM, "Zachary Turner" <zturner at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We should revert this if it's definitely the culprit. Otherwise it's
>>>> impossible for to detect another patch later which also causes a
>>>> regression. It's easy to fix and resubmit later
>>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:03 PM Vince Harron <vharron at google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian-clang/builds/3326
>>>>>
>>>>> Shows about 20 new test failures.  I've narrowed it down to r228886
>>>>>
>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?revision=228886&view=revision
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you take a look and/or give me some idea what to look for?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Vince
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Vince Harron | Technical Lead Manager | vharron at google.com |
>>>>> 858-442-0868
>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>>>>> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150213/dacf23ee/attachment.html>