[lldb-dev] marking new summary output for expected timeouts

[Todd Fiala via lldb-dev]

Oh yeah, that's fine.  I won't take that code out.

Hmm at least some of the builds went through this weekend, I made a number
of changes Saturday morning (US Pacific time) that I saw go through the
Ubuntu 14.04 cmake bot.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Pavel Labath <labath at google.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we've had an unrelated breaking change, so the buildbots were red over
> the weekend. I've fixed it now, and it seems to be turning green.
> We've also had power outage during the weekend and not all of the
> buildbots are back up yet, as we need to wait for MTV to wake up. I'd
> like to give this at least one more day, to give them a chance to
> stabilize. Is this blocking you from making further changes to the
> test event system?
>
> pl
>
> On 12 December 2015 at 00:20, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey Pavel and/or Tamas,
> >
> > Let me know when we're definitely all clear on the expected timeout
> support
> > I added to the (now once again) newer default test results.
> >
> > As soon as we don't need the legacy summary results anymore, I'm going to
> > strip out the code that manages it.  It is quite messy and duplicates the
> > content that is better handled by the test event system.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -Todd
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I went ahead and added the expected timeout support in r255363.
> >>
> >> I'm going to turn back on the new BasicResultsFormatter as the default.
> >> We can flip this back off if it is still not doing everything we need,
> but I
> >> *think* we cover the issue you saw now.
> >>
> >> -Todd
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Pavel,
> >>>
> >>> I'm going to adjust the new summary output for expected timeouts.  I
> hope
> >>> to do that in the next hour or less.  I'll put that in and flip the
> default
> >>> back on for using the new summary output.
> >>>
> >>> I'll do those two changes separately, so you can revert the flip back
> on
> >>> to flip it back off if we still have an issue.
> >>>
> >>> Sound good?
> >>>
> >>> (This can be orthogonal to the new work to mark up expected timeouts).
> >>> --
> >>> -Todd
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -Todd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Todd
>



-- 
-Todd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20151214/09547d56/attachment.html>