[lldb-dev] BasicResultsFormatter - new test results summary

[Todd Fiala via lldb-dev]

Sure, I can do that.

Tamas, okay to give more detail on -v?  I'll give it a shot to see what
else comes out if we do that.

-Todd

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tamas,
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Tamas Berghammer <tberghammer at google.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> HI Todd,
>>>
>>> You changed the way the test failure list is printed in a way that now
>>> we only print the name of the test function failing with the name of the
>>> test file in parenthesis. Can we add back the name of the test class to
>>> this list?
>>>
>>
>> Sure.  I originally planned to have that in there but there was some
>> discussion about it being too much info.  I'm happy to add that back.
>>
> Can we have it tied to verbosity level?  We have -t and -v, maybe one of
> those could trigger more detail in the summary view.
>



-- 
-Todd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20151210/2ee87f07/attachment.html>