[lldb-dev] New test summary results formatter

[Zachary Turner via lldb-dev]

Can --results-file=stdout be the default so that we don't have to specify
that?

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:02 AM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev <
lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Also, all the text in the summary is fixed-width lined up nicely, which
> may not show in the commit message description if you're using a
> variable-width font.  On a terminal it looks nice.
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I just put up an optional test results formatter that is a prototype of
>>> what we may move towards for our default test summary results.  It went in
>>> here:
>>>
>>> r254530
>>>
>>> and you can try it out with something like:
>>>
>>> time test/dotest.py --executable `pwd`/build/Debug/lldb
>>> --results-formatter
>>> lldbsuite.test.basic_results_formatter.BasicResultsFormatter --results-file
>>> st
>>> out
>>>
>>>
>> I cut and paste my line, but more than likely for most people you'd just
>> want this:
>>
>> test/dotest.py --results-formatter
>> lldbsuite.test.basic_results_formatter.BasicResultsFormatter --results-file
>> stdout
>>
>> The other stuff was specific to my setup.  That line assumes you run from
>> the lldb source dir root.
>>
>>
>> Let me know if this satisfies the basic needs of counts and whatnot.  It
>>> counts test method runs rather than all the oddball "file, class, etc."
>>> counts we had before.
>>>
>>> It prints out the Details section when there are details, and keeps it
>>> nice and clean when there are none.
>>>
>>> It also mentions a bit about test reruns up top, but that won't come
>>> into play until I get the multi-test-pass, single-worker/low-load mechanism
>>> in place, which will depend on newer rerun count awareness support.
>>>
>>> The change also cleans up places where the test event framework was
>>> using string codes and replaces them with symbolic constants.
>>>
>>> Let me know what you think.  I can tweak it as needed to address testbot
>>> and other needs.  Once it looks reasonable, I'd like to move over to using
>>> it by default in the parallel test runner rather than the legacy support.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> --
>>> -Todd
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Todd
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Todd
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20151202/75ba11b3/attachment-0001.html>