[lldb-dev] test results look typical?

Mon Aug 24 16:29:08 PDT 2015

>
>  Ah okay, so we are working with libc++ on Ubuntu, that's good to hear.
> Pre-14.04 I gave up on it.

We're still using libstdc++ for lldb itself. libc++ is used to compile
inferiors for the TestDataFormatterLibcc* tests. I don't actually know if
libc++ works with lldb. Sorry to get your hopes up. :(

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Chaoren Lin <chaorenl at google.com> wrote:
>
>> The TestDataFormatterLibcc* tests require libc++-dev:
>>
>> $ sudo apt-get install libc++-dev
>>
>>
> Ah okay, so we are working with libc++ on Ubuntu, that's good to hear.
> Pre-14.04 I gave up on it.
>
> Will cmake automatically choose libc++ if it is present?  Or do I need to
> pass something to cmake to use libc++?
>
> Thanks, Chaoren!
>
> -Todd
>
>
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Todd Fiala via lldb-dev <
>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can't comment on the failures for Linux, but I don't think we have a
>>>> good handle on the unexpected successes.  I only added that information to
>>>> the output about a week ago, before that unexpected successes were actually
>>>> going unnoticed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Okay, thanks Zachary.   A while back we had some flapping tests that
>>> would oscillate between unexpected success and failure on Linux.  Some of
>>> those might still be in that state but maybe (!) are fixed.
>>>
>>> Anyone on the Linux end who happens to know if the fails in particular
>>> look normal, that'd be good to know.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's likely that someone could just go in there and remove the XFAIL
>>>> from those tests.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM Todd Fiala via lldb-dev <
>>>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm just trying to get a handle on current lldb test failures across
>>>>> different platforms.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Linux on non-virtualized hardware, I currently see the failures
>>>>> below on Ubuntu 14.04.2 using a setup like this:
>>>>> * stock linker (ld.bfd),
>>>>> * g++ 4.9.2
>>>>> * cmake
>>>>> * ninja
>>>>> * libstdc++
>>>>>
>>>>> ninja check-lldb output:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (15 failed) (3.807107%)
>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (17 failed) (3.586498%)
>>>>> Failing Tests (15)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux rad 3.13.0-57-generic
>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux rad 3.13.0-57-generic
>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux rad 3.13.0-57-generic
>>>>> #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>>
>>>>> Unexpected Successes (10)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py (Linux
>>>>> rad 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64
>>>>> x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux rad
>>>>> 3.13.0-57-generic #95-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 19 09:28:15 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On a similar setup, although bumped up to Ubuntu 14.04.3 and now on a
>>>>> VMWare VM, everything else the same, I see a similar report from 'ninja
>>>>> check-lldb':
>>>>>
>>>>> Ran 394 test suites (17 failed) (4.314721%)
>>>>> Ran 474 test cases (19 failed) (4.008439%)
>>>>> Failing Tests (17)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestAttachResume.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestCPPThis.py (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic
>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccIterator.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMap.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibccMultiMap.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxMultiSet.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxSet.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterLibcxxString.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterSkipSummary.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestDataFormatterUnordered.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShowPrint.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestRegisterVariables.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStaticVariables.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepNoDebug.py (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic
>>>>> #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestStepOverWatchpoint.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestTypedefArray.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> FAIL: LLDB (suite) :: TestVectorTypesFormatting.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>>
>>>>> Unexpected Successes (11)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestBatchMode.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestEvents.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestExitDuringStep.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestFdLeak.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestInferiorAssert.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiGdbSetShow.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiInterpreterExec.py (Linux
>>>>> lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestMiSyntax.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestRaise.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestStubSetSID.py (Linux lldb
>>>>> 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17 UTC 2015
>>>>> x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: LLDB (suite) :: TestWatchedVarHitWhenInScope.py
>>>>> (Linux lldb 3.19.0-26-generic #28~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 12 14:09:17
>>>>> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64)
>>>>> ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do these more or less match the current state of affairs for Linux
>>>>> tests?  If not, are there any suggestions on best practices for upgrades?
>>>>> A while back I had tried things like clang and libc++ but I had arrived at
>>>>> the above setup (albeit typically with the gold linker) simply due to what
>>>>> worked, what was easy to debug and what built fast.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for any confirmation on that!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -Todd
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>>>>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Todd
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>>> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Todd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20150824/91fe4f12/attachment-0001.html>