[lldb-dev] [PATCH] Tentative patch to move JITMemoryManager in to LLDB.

[Lang Hames]

I should have checked lldb-commits first. That sounds like a much better
option. :)

- Lang.

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Tong Shen <endlessroad at google.com> wrote:

> Oops, sorry Lang, didn't see your patch.
>
> The old JIT has been completely removed by upstream LLVM :-(
> So I think it's better to avoid maintaining that ourselves...
>
> Also, the functions specific to the old JITMemoryManager seems not
> used by lldb (except the wrapper functions).
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > See also Tong's patch to just move to SectionMemoryManager on
> lldb-commits :)
> >
> > -eric
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> The JITMemoryManager class was removed from MCJIT in r218316, but LLDB
> is
> >> still relying on it.
> >>
> >> The attached patch moves the JITMemoryManager in to LLDB (minus the
> AtExit
> >> handler functionality, which I don't believe LLDB was using, and which
> was
> >> causing build warnings for me locally).
> >>
> >> I'm still running the test suite locally, so I'm sure whether this
> passes
> >> all the tests, but it does at least seem to get LLDB building again.
> >>
> >> I'll update with test results as soon as they come through.
> >>
> >> - Lang.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lldb-dev mailing list
> >> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Tong Shen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140923/a8fc606d/attachment.html>