[lldb-dev] Continuation of single stopped SBThread

[Eran Ifrah]

>From my experience, any command that can be used by the API can be invoked
problematically like this:




On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Mario Zechner <badlogicgames at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> i'm currently working on a debugger based on the public LLDB API and am
> currently looking into multi-threaded debugging. The debugger should
> support the following scenario:
>
> - user sets breakpoints
> - two or more threads get stopped due to breakpoints
> - user wants to continue execution of only one of the threads
>
> SBThread has the methods Suspend/Resume. To my understanding (and tests),
> Suspend marks a thread as not to be continued when the entire process is
> continued. Which is the oposite of what i'd need for my use case.
>
> I looked into the implementation of the command 'thread continue', but
> that uses the private LLDB API, which is sadly not an option for us at this
> point.
>
> I'd be greatful for any hints.
>
> Thanks,
> Mario
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
>


-- 
Eran Ifrah,
Author of codelite, a cross platform open source C/C++ IDE:
http://www.codelite.org
CodeLite IDE Blog: http://codeliteide.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140904/9ffc1e08/attachment.html>