[lldb-dev] hold off on check-ins, please [ALL CLEAR]

[Todd Fiala]

I generally sync llvm/clang in the AM, locked, and work with that
throughout the day.  If I kept up with TOT on all, all day long, I'm pretty
sure my work machine, big as it is, would be building all day long ;-)

The only time this has bitten me is when something LLDB depends on changes.
Then I fix that or synch to the fix requirement that somebody else made.

Are you suggesting something different?

-Todd

On Tuesday, July 29, 2014, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tfiala at google.com');>> wrote:
>
>> A sync on all 3 of llvm, clang and lldb up to r214233 has removed all the
>> new errors on Linux and MacOSX.
>>
>
> So, maybe I'm just new no LLDB, but is there *ever* any expectation that
> all three repos don't need to be version locked?
>
> Clang, LLVM, LLD, compiler-rt, etc. are all absolutely version locked.
> While things *may* work if you are skewed by a bit, there is no guarantee
> and this is an expected failure mode if you take the risk....
>
> Is this different in LLDB?
>


-- 
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | tfiala at google.com | 650-943-3180
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140729/4045f983/attachment.html>