[lldb-dev] Linux: "doesn't contain the architecture x86_64"

[Todd Fiala]

Hi again,

Keno - what revision of lldb are you synched to?  I recall seeing some
platform changes go in today, I think after my last sync/build.

Thanks,
Todd


On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com> wrote:

> FWIW - I just tried this on Ubuntu 14.04 with a build at r213575 (earlier
> today):
>
> tfiala at tfiala2:/mnt/ssd/work/macosx.sync/mbp-git/build-debug$ bin/lldb
> (lldb) file /bin/ls
> Current executable set to '/bin/ls' (x86_64).
> (lldb) run
> Process 20313 launching
> Process 20313 launched: '/bin/ls' (x86_64)
> Process 20313 stopped
> * thread #1: tid = 20313, 0x00007fdaa88d42d0, name = 'ls', stop reason = trace
>     frame #0: 0x00007fdaa88d42d0
> error: No such process
> 2014-06-29-23_22_22  CMakeFiles               examples          rules.ninja
> 2014-06-29-23_22_40  cmake_install.cmake      include           share
> bin                  CPackConfig.cmake        lib               test
> build.ninja          CPackSourceConfig.cmake  lldb-test-traces  tools
> cmake                docs                     LLVMBuild.cmake   unittests
> CMakeCache.txt       DummyConfigureOutput     projects          utils
> Process 20313 exited with status = 0 (0x00000000)
> (lldb)
>
> That seemed to work, but is Ubuntu 14.04 vs. 12.04.
>
> -Todd
> ​
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Can you send me your /bin/ls?  (Direct send to me, might need to .tar.gz
>> it).  I can see if we're identifying it correctly at the object file level.
>>
>> With recent platform additions, we may have borked something.
>>
>> Have you tried running the tests on your end?  There are a few tests in
>> test/functionalities/object-file that will verify if we're parsing the
>> object files correctly.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Keno Fischer <
>> kfischer at college.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> This is on
>>>
>>> 64-bit Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.2.0-61-generic x86_64)
>>>
>>> I started a bisect. I can confirm that this worked on Feb 28 (I chose
>>> that arbitrarily for the start of the bisect), so it must have broken since.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Keno,
>>>>
>>>> Which Linux distribution and bitness (64/32) are you on?
>>>>
>>>> I've seen similar behavior when platforms or object files
>>>> inappropriately identify (or mis-identify) which files they can do
>>>> something with.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Keno Fischer <
>>>> kfischer at college.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just rebuilt lldb on a linux machine (usually I'm on mac), and I'm
>>>>> seeing this (for all programs on the machine). Has anybody seen this
>>>>> before (before I dive into debugging)?
>>>>>
>>>>> >usr/bin/lldb /bin/ls
>>>>> error: '/bin/ls' doesn't contain the architecture x86_64
>>>>>
>>>>> Keno
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>>>>> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>  Todd Fiala | Software Engineer |  tfiala at google.com |  650-943-3180
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Fiala | Software Engineer |  tfiala at google.com |  650-943-3180
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Fiala | Software Engineer |  tfiala at google.com |  650-943-3180
>



-- 
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | tfiala at google.com | 650-943-3180
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140721/dd0ca570/attachment.html>