[lldb-dev] large patches vs incremental changes
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Tue Jul 1 13:31:53 PDT 2014
On Jul 1, 2014, at 12:44 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
> Additionally, I frequently see patches going in without review. What is LLDB's policy on this?
>
> FWIW, I would assume (from the discussions with Chris when LLDB first joined the LLVM projects) that it has the same policy as LLVM here. Chris, I don't actually see any clarification about this on the LLDB website, could we get that in there? I'm somewhat concerned that there is essentially *no* developer policy posted for LLDB.
>
Aside from the coding standards being substantially different (which I’m not thrilled about), LLDB follows the same developer policies as the rest of LLVM.
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140701/a4074c08/attachment.html>
More information about the lldb-dev
mailing list