[lldb-dev] Acceptance of dwarf2/3 suggested form of DW_AT_comp_dir
Matthew Gardiner
mg11 at csr.com
Thu Aug 21 02:45:42 PDT 2014
Sorry, my emailer messed up the extract from the DW_AT_comp_dir
definition. It should be:
A DW_AT_comp_dir attribute whose value is a null-terminated string
containing the
current working directory of the compilation command that produced this
compilation unit
in whatever form makes sense for the host system.
The suggested form for the value of the DW_AT_comp_dir attribute on UNIX
systems is
"hostname:pathname". If no hostname is available, the suggested form is
":pathname".
Apologies
Matt
Matthew Gardiner wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The DWARF2/3 standard specifies DW_AT_comp_dir as follows:
>
> "
> A DW_AT_comp_dir attribute whose value is a null-terminated string
> containing the
> current working directory of the compilation command that produced
> this compilation unit
> in whatever form makes sense for the host system.
>
> /The suggested form for the value of the DW_AT_comp_dir attribute on U
> NIX systems is//
> //‘‘hostname:pathname’’. If no hostname is available, the suggested
> form is ‘‘:pathname’’.//
> /"
>
> The section in italics (see the spec. for yourselves) is unfortunate,
> since in the Introduction we are told that italicised text are "not
> part of the format definition itself", but by using the word
> "suggested" in the definition the implies compliance with the definition.
>
> Consulting the DWARF4 standard's definition I see that the errant
> italicised text has been removed. (I say errant because in my opinion,
> the suggested form, contradicts the earlier requirement "makes sense
> for the host system", as the hostname:pathname or :pathname forms are
> not acceptable to the UNIXs stat or open functions).
>
> I note that the earlier versions of gcc ignored this "suggested form".
>
> Unfortunately the toolchain which I'm using follows the suggested form
> for UNIX systems, e.g.:
>
> mg11-fc20.root.pri:/home/mg11/mydirectory/step.c
>
> This isn't currently acceptable to lldb, since when I am stepping an
> inferior, the DisplaySourceLinesXXX functions fail to perform, due to
> GetFileStats predictably failing when ::stat is passed a
> hostname:pathname style of string.
>
> Now I could get our toolchain fixed (so that it ignores DWARF2's
> suggestion, and encodes only the pathname), but I wondered whether it
> was worth seeing how the rest of the lldb community feels regarding
> supporting the suggested DWARF2/3 form.
>
> thanks
> Matthew Gardiner
>
>
>
>
>
> Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in
> England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office
> Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4
> 0WZ, United Kingdom
> More information can be found at www.csr.com. Keep up to date with CSR
> on our technical blog, www.csr.com/blog, CSR people blog,
> www.csr.com/people, YouTube, www.youtube.com/user/CSRplc, Facebook,
> www.facebook.com/pages/CSR/191038434253534, or follow us on Twitter at
> www.twitter.com/CSR_plc.
> New for 2014, you can now access the wide range of products powered by
> aptX at www.aptx.com.
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
>
> To report this email as spam click
> https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/hykHA4p4WMPGX2PQPOmvUj!GOBh06pKKly9mk+uW7rsLSFR!gqRvc!BeenG!zYJbnWmucxV8kYDBcfXS4znW5Q==
> .
More information about the lldb-dev
mailing list