[lldb-dev] (no subject)

[Todd Fiala]

I think the issue there is that sometimes the warning is appropriate.

On Saturday, April 5, 2014, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de>
wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 11:04:46AM -0700, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not against it.
> > >
> > > Locally I've occasionally done the static_cast<void*> (something_p) and
> > > that shuts up the gcc %p warning.  (And in the process have found
> > > interesting things like enum cases being ignored, etc.).
> > >
> > > One negative of all that IMHO is that it adds clutter, but if it helps
> us
> > > find real warnings, my vote would be to do it.
> > >
> >
> > Just an FYI in case people missed it, I pushed the change to quiet up
> that
> > warning.  There are still a few other warnings that are floating around,
> > but, it is a much more happy build now.
>
> I don't think this is the correct approach, the warning should just be
> disabled for GCC as lame...
>
> Joerg
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu <javascript:;>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>


-- 
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | tfiala at google.com | 650-943-3180
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140405/37ef7056/attachment.html>