[lldb-dev] Linux command line issues

[Malea, Daniel]

Agreed. Will file a bugzilla accordingly.

On 2013-05-08 5:26 PM, "Greg Clayton" <gclayton at apple.com> wrote:

>My concern is that we present the most useful symbol to the user when we
>stop. The disassembly is broken up as a result of the __libc_malloc
>symbol. I am guessing this symbol __libc_malloc has a size of zero. When
>looking up a symbol by address, we are finding "__libc_malloc" first
>instead of just "malloc". We should be picking "malloc" first if it has a
>valid byte size.
>