[lldb-dev] Ignoring Signals via the API

[Greg Clayton]

I would think keeping it simple with accessor functions on SBProcess would be the way to go. We should be able to read the current settings for each signal, and set them. Maybe something like:


bool
SBProcess::GetUnixSignalSettings (int signo, bool &notify, bool &stop, bool &suppress);

bool
SBProcess::SetUnixSignalSettings (int signo, bool notify, bool stop, bool suppress);


On Jun 18, 2013, at 1:57 AM, Russell Harmon <russ at eatnumber1.com> wrote:

> I'm currently thinking wrapping the UnixSignals object into an SBUnixSignals, or would you prefer an API in SBProcess which is restricted to only ShouldNotify, ShouldStop and ShouldSuppress?
> 
> --
> Russell Harmon
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Greg Clayton <gclayton at apple.com> wrote:
> Doesn't look like it. Feel free to propose a new API for SBProcess.
> 
> On Jun 16, 2013, at 5:27 AM, Russell Harmon <russ at eatnumber1.com> wrote:
> 
> > Is there currently a way to configure LLDB's signal disposition via it's API? I'm not seeing a way.
> > --
> > Russell Harmon
> > _______________________________________________
> > lldb-dev mailing list
> > lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> 
>