[lldb-dev] question about rdar 12566646 and 10887661

[Malea, Daniel]

Thanks Jim. I removed the bogus decorator in r175307.


On 2013-02-15, at 3:49 PM, Jim Ingham <jingham at apple.com>
 wrote:

> Yes, both of those are marked as fixed, and you should be able to remove the expectedFailure decorators.
> 
> Jim
> 
> On Feb 15, 2013, at 12:32 PM, "Malea, Daniel" <daniel.malea at intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I have a quick question about two test cases that are passing unexpectedly on both Linux and Mac:
>> 
>> TestStructTypes.py (expected to fail due to rdar://problem/12566646)
>> TestRdar10887661.py
>> 
>> Are the rdars associated with them still open? Can I remove the expectedFailure decorators?
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>> 
>> Daniel Malea daniel.malea at intel.com
>>  Intel Embedded Computing, Debuggers & Libraries
>>  Intel Waterloo
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>