[lldb-dev] question about rdar 12566646 and 10887661
daniel.malea at intel.com
Fri Feb 15 13:36:33 PST 2013
Thanks Jim. I removed the bogus decorator in r175307.
On 2013-02-15, at 3:49 PM, Jim Ingham <jingham at apple.com>
> Yes, both of those are marked as fixed, and you should be able to remove the expectedFailure decorators.
> On Feb 15, 2013, at 12:32 PM, "Malea, Daniel" <daniel.malea at intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I have a quick question about two test cases that are passing unexpectedly on both Linux and Mac:
>> TestStructTypes.py (expected to fail due to rdar://problem/12566646)
>> Are the rdars associated with them still open? Can I remove the expectedFailure decorators?
>> Daniel Malea daniel.malea at intel.com
>> Intel Embedded Computing, Debuggers & Libraries
>> Intel Waterloo
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
More information about the lldb-dev