[lldb-dev] LLDB back in sync with top-of-tree LLVM/Clang

[João Matos]

We already have the Windows branch working with CMake and VS, but maybe
it's best to wait until it is merged with trunk to add the bot.

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:23 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>wrote:

> 2012/9/25 João Matos <ripzonetriton at gmail.com>:
> > Could we get a MSVC build bot of the Windows branch too? If this is
> possible
> > who should I contact?
>
> I may maintain a builder in bb.pgr.jp, when the build (of lldb) would be
> ready.
>
> Then, I assume lldb should be in sync against llvm (and clang) trunk.
>
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:30 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> George, as far as I know,
> >>
> >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-linux
> >> http://llvm-amd64.freebsd.your.org:8010/builders/lldb-amd64-freebsd
> >> http://llvm-amd64.freebsd.your.org:8010/builders/lldb-i386-freebsd
> >>
> >> ...Takumi
> >>
> >> 2012/9/25 George Russell <george at codeplay.com>:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Are there currently any publically viewable LLDB build-bots that can
> >> > show
> >> > the build status / test status of LLDB?
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > George
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 25/09/12 00:23, Sean Callanan wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> As of revision 164563 (but, as I say below, please check out 164573),
> >> >> LLDB
> >> >> is back in sync with top-of-tree Clang.
> >> >>
> >> >> This commit has several important implications:
> >> >> –
> >> >> 1. LLDB is no longer tied to a specific Clang revision.  LLDB
> >> >> top-of-tree
> >> >> is intended to build against Clang top-of-tree.  That means we have
> to
> >> >> fix
> >> >> any build failures quickly, and I'll be keeping track of
> compatibility
> >> >> until
> >> >> we get a more permanent solution.
> >> >> 2. We no longer use local patches (scripts/{llvm,clang}.*.diff) of
> any
> >> >> sort.  To ensure LLDB stability, we will make LLDB release branches
> >> >> that
> >> >> will be tied to Clang release branches.
> >> >> 3. We no longer use or commit llvm.zip.  If you don't want to have to
> >> >> rebuild Clang, just don't update your local lldb/llvm tree.
> >> >> –
> >> >> Building LLDB on OS X works the same way it did before: open up
> >> >> lldb.xcworkspace and build the LLDB scheme.
> >> >>
> >> >> For your convenience, I have added a new configuration to the
> >> >> .xcodeproj:
> >> >> DebugClang (available as of revision 164573).  Here's the difference
> >> >> between
> >> >> Debug and DebugClang:
> >> >>
> >> >> - Debug builds a Release+Asserts version of Clang, which is easy on
> the
> >> >> debug information size, but still appropriately yelps when LLDB
> abuses
> >> >> it.
> >> >> - DebugClang builds a Debug+Asserts version of Clang, which contains
> a
> >> >> TON
> >> >> of debug information.
> >> >>
> >> >> Unless you are working specifically on the Clang integration, you'll
> >> >> probably prefer Debug.
> >> >>
> >> >> Sean
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> lldb-dev mailing list
> >> >> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > lldb-dev mailing list
> >> > lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lldb-dev mailing list
> >> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > João Matos
>



-- 
João Matos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20120925/b1e76d8e/attachment.html>