[lldb-dev] [llvm-commits] [Lldb-commits] Removing builder lldb-x86_64-linux?

[Malea, Daniel]

Hi Duncan, sorry for the delayed response!

Our team here (at Intel) is definitely interested in keeping the LLDB Linux builds green, and we can commit to watching the bots and contacting anyone who doesn't fix a build-breaking commit.

During the Hacker-Lab and LLDB-BOF last week, it sounded like many people are interested in running LLDB in all sorts of scenarios, and getting continuous build/test runs on additional platforms can only help the project get more stable.

I'd be glad to assist you in getting the initial builds passing. Currently I'm using libstdc++ and my colleague Matt Kopec (cc'd) has LLDB building with libc++ (both of us build with ToT clang on Ubuntu). If you're still interested in doing the work to set up the bots, we can discuss what configurations are reasonable/most beneficial to run.

Cheers,
Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Duncan Sands [mailto:duncan.sands at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Duncan Sands
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 12:29 PM
To: Malea, Daniel
Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [Lldb-commits] Removing builder lldb-x86_64-linux?

Hi Dan,

On 10/11/12 18:20, Malea, Daniel wrote:
> Sure, I like the idea of additional compiler support! It would be 
> great to build the tests with clang/gcc as well. If there is extra 
> capacity, there may be value in enabling debug/release builds. 
> Hopefully we'll catch more bugs this way :)

the only problem is that I'm don't want to spend time on this if the builders are just going to be ignored.  Greg says that the current builder isn't ignored, but I'm sceptical.

Ciao, Duncan.

>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
> ps. Currently in trunk, several tests hang, so it's probably best to hold off on Linux testing until those test cases are disabled or the root cause is addressed.
>
> On 2012-11-10, at 11:56 AM, "Duncan Sands" <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> On 10/11/12 17:54, Malea, Daniel wrote:
>>> Any reason to not use clang? We use clang (recent trunk but with libstdc++) when building LLDB on Linux and things are mostly smooth.
>>>
>>> As I understand it, libc++ is also a viable option for Linux, though I haven't tried myself.
>>
>> why not both, or more?  There's enough capacity to have (say) four 
>> lldb builders, all built with some different variation of compiler and libraries.
>>
>> Ciao, Duncan.
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2012-11-10, at 5:12 AM, "Duncan Sands" <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>
>>>> On 08/11/12 18:59, Greg Clayton wrote:
>>>>> First off: we do care about the build bot, but the version of GCC that the build is using the build LLDB has a bug in the C++ std library where std::shared_ptr doesn't compile in code that has RTTI disabled. I believe this is fixed in GCC 4.5 and later. Is there any way we can get the buildbot to get an updated GCC?
>>>>
>>>> it is using gcc-4.6.2, so should have the fix.  I can use any 
>>>> version of gcc that you would like though.  Shall I install gcc-4.7?
>>>>
>>>> Ciao, Duncan.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Greg Clayton
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 7, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am going to remove builder lldb-x86_64-linux from llvm 
>>>>>> buildmaster, Seems no one is watching the builder, it fails for a very long time.
>>>>>> If there are any objections, please speak up!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the builder:
>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-linux
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> lldb-commits mailing list
>>>>>> lldb-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>