[lldb-dev] Looking for an equivalent of "gdb return"

[Filipe Cabecinhas]

Hi,

I had a small extension that implemented this command (of course it comes with lots of problems in the presence of highly optimized code). I can update the patches and submit them for review.  

Regards,

  Filipe


On Monday, May 28, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:

>  
> Le 27 mai 2012 à 19:06, Greg Clayton a écrit :
>  
> >  
> > On May 27, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> >  
> > >  
> > > Le 26 mai 2012 à 19:25, Greg Clayton a écrit :
> > >  
> > > >  
> > > > On May 26, 2012, at 4:05 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >  
> > > > > I'm moving from GDB to LLDB, and while I managed to perform almost everything I need with LLDB, I miss one GDB feature.
> > > > >  
> > > > > The return command:
> > > > >  
> > > > > help return
> > > > > Make selected stack frame return to its caller.
> > > > > Control remains in the debugger, but when you continue
> > > > > execution will resume in the frame above the one now selected.
> > > > > If an argument is given, it is an expression for the value to return.
> > > > >  
> > > > > Is there some equivalent in LLDB ?  
> > > >  
> > > > Unfortunately, no. Feel free to file an enhancement request.
> > >  
> > > Which bug reporter do you recommend for such request ? llvm bug reporter or Apple bug reporter ?  
> >  
> > Apple would get the most attention from the LLDB team here at Apple.
>  
> OK.  
> Filled as rdar://11543846
>  
> -- Jean-Daniel
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu (mailto:lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu)
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev