[lldb-dev] LLVM 3.2 release notes
Kostya Serebryany
kcc at google.com
Fri Dec 14 10:12:01 PST 2012
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote:
>
> > Don't think any of the above ASan features are worth mentioning. Perhaps
> > cmake support and error reporting.
>
>
> Seems there was quite a bit of development in ASan/TSan and besides
> just bug fixes there must some good features worth mentioning
> in addition to cmake and error reporting?
>
> Might be easier if you could just provide short blurb.
>
I actually don't think we did any significant user-visible improvements in
asan other than LOTS of bug/performance/compatibility fixes.
asan for OSX and Android did not exist in 3.1 (Alex, right?), so these two
platforms could be included into the release notes:
Improvements to AddressSanitizer including better portability (OSX,
Android NDK), support for cmake based builds, enhanced error reporting and
lots of bug fixes.
--kcc
>
> Pawel
>
>
> > On Dec 14, 2012 8:42 AM, "Kostya Serebryany" <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> >
> >> [did this go to lldb-dev on purpose?]
> >>
> >> Hi Pawel,
> >>
> >> From these docs:
> >>Improvemens to AddressSanitizer<
> http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/tools/clang/docs/AddressSanitizer.html>
> including:
> >> increasing stack size limit to 256M, better portability
> >> (iOS6,Windows,Android NDK), support for cmake based builds, enhanced
> error
> >> reporting.
> >>
> >> - ThreadSanitizer (TSan)<
> http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/tools/clang/docs/ThreadSanitizer.html> -
> >> data race detector run-time library for C/C++ has been added.
> >> - Improvemens to AddressSanitizer<
> http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/tools/clang/docs/AddressSanitizer.html>
> including:
> >> increasing stack size limit to 256M, better portability
> >> (iOS6,Windows,Android NDK), support for cmake based builds, enhanced
> error
> >> reporting.
> >>
> >>
> >> Both links point to nowhere.
> >> AddressSanitizer's support for iOS and Windows is immature to include it
> >> into release notes.
> >> Did we do the "increasing stack size limit to 256M" bit?
> >>
> >> --kcc
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The LLVM 3.2 release is wrapping up, and the 3.2 release notes are
> being
> >>> finalized. There is a section describing improvements in LLVM 3.2 that
> >>> could use some help, please take a look when you get a chance:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_32/docs/ReleaseNotes.html?revision=HEAD#lldb
> >>>
> >>> I think that improvements in linux support, in particular, may be worth
> >>> highlighting along with the other general goodness that has happened
> since
> >>> LLVM 3.1 branched. Feel free to commit improvements directly to the
> >>> release_32 branch, or email Pawel text to include.
> >>>
> >>> -Chris
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> lldb-dev mailing list
> >>> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20121214/ac59c3a1/attachment.html>
More information about the lldb-dev
mailing list