[lldb-dev] lldb patches for OpenBSD

Greg Clayton gclayton at apple.com
Fri Apr 1 14:36:54 PDT 2011

That would be fine. We will need to track down any printf statements (or similar Printf stream calls) that use thread IDs and make sure to specify:


instead of our current default of:


On Apr 1, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Stephen Wilson <wilsons at start.ca> wrote:
>> So I think the main question is:  does having the full 64 bit pointer as
>> an ID give useful info to the developers using user-space threads?
> Is there a reason not to just make the thread ID a 64-bit value and be
> done with it?  Seems like doing anything else is over-engineering the
> problem.

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list