[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [llvm] [SPARC] Add missing dynamic tags handling in llvm-readobj and LLDB (PR #206316)

[Jessica Clarke via lldb-commits]

jrtc27 wrote:

> No, strictly speaking. But only the change in DynamicTags.def. The rest is a pure refactoring in my opinion. Removed.

But both getDynamicTagAsString functions previously treated the SPARC dynamic tags as machine-independent, so any architecture that didn't already have a tag defined for 0x70000001 would have decoded such a tag as SPARC_REGISTER not `<unknown:>0x70000001`. So that's an observable functional change, even if the input to observe it is likely questionable.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206316