[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Implement delayed breakpoints (PR #192971)

[Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan via lldb-commits]

felipepiovezan wrote:

> If we have an eager breakpoint, and there are any enqueued delayed breakpoints, send the delayed breakpoints before we process the eager breakpoint.

Yeah, to me this makes the most sense as well. The whole eager business was a late addition, so it slipped through the cracks, but it is clearly wrong to not flush the cache while doing the eager breakpoint.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/192971