[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb][Docs] Fix presentation of some default values (PR #192239)

[David Spickett via lldb-commits]

https://github.com/DavidSpickett commented:

If I understand correctly, before we were using this `nodes.literal` which is (or is equivalent to) one backtick.

Now we use some default field type and we manually put one or more backticks around it.

> We can escape backticks inside the string by changing the fence. Markdown can take any number of backticks at the start as long as they match the amount at the end ([spec](https://spec.commonmark.org/0.31.2/#code-spans)).

So if we had 2 backticks in the value, we would still have the problem, right?

I know it's very unlikely to be a problem, but could you replace the simple check for backtick with a check for a run of backticks and then set the fence to be one greater than that?

Easy to do, and makes the code a bit less suspicious if we have different problems in future.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/192239