[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] convert jit-loader_rtdyld_elf.test to an API test (PR #170333)

Stefan Gränitz via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 16 02:56:07 PST 2025


weliveindetail wrote:

> Sorry about this. Should I revert the commit?

Well, the work is done and you have gained an understanding how the test works. That's a win too :) The new test is less maintainable for me, but if you take over maintenance, then this is fine. Also, this could be a good example of "how to write a test for Shell vs. API"?

> EDIT: Just saw https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172292

For me personally, the JITLink pendant is the relevant one and I'd like to keep that as a LIT command-line test. You could consider to apply the same restriction to the API test, if you keep seeing flakes.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170333


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list