[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb][DWARFASTParserClang] Treat DW_TAG_template_alias like we do DW_TAG_typedef (PR #170135)

[Michael Buch via lldb-commits]

Michael137 wrote:

> > One compelling reason to support `DW_TAG_template_alias` is that with `-gsimple-template-names`, `DW_TAG_typedef`s for alias templates have their template parameters stripped from the `DW_AT_name`.
> 
> 
> 
> Is this true? https://godbolt.org/z/YEPE1fobE doesn't /look/ like it's true?

Oh maybe I'm misremembering, thought that's why Sony needed it. Let me check

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170135