[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb][nfc] Fix comment about UINT32_MAX in UnwindAssemblyInstruction (PR #168339)
via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 17 02:38:06 PST 2025
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan (felipepiovezan)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168339.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/include/lldb/Core/EmulateInstruction.h (+2-2)
``````````diff
diff --git a/lldb/include/lldb/Core/EmulateInstruction.h b/lldb/include/lldb/Core/EmulateInstruction.h
index a9fd4543cbbcb..ff1386cce570b 100644
--- a/lldb/include/lldb/Core/EmulateInstruction.h
+++ b/lldb/include/lldb/Core/EmulateInstruction.h
@@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ class EmulateInstruction : public PluginInterface {
const RegisterInfo *reg_info,
const RegisterValue ®_value);
- // Type to represent the condition of an instruction. The UINT32 value is
- // reserved for the unconditional case and all other value can be used in an
+ // Type to represent the condition of an instruction. The UINT32_MAX value is
+ // reserved for the unconditional case and all other values can be used in an
// architecture dependent way.
typedef uint32_t InstructionCondition;
static const InstructionCondition UnconditionalCondition = UINT32_MAX;
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168339
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list