[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb][nfc] Fix comment about UINT32_MAX in UnwindAssemblyInstruction (PR #168339)

via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 17 02:38:06 PST 2025


llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb

Author: Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan (felipepiovezan)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>



---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168339.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) lldb/include/lldb/Core/EmulateInstruction.h (+2-2) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/lldb/include/lldb/Core/EmulateInstruction.h b/lldb/include/lldb/Core/EmulateInstruction.h
index a9fd4543cbbcb..ff1386cce570b 100644
--- a/lldb/include/lldb/Core/EmulateInstruction.h
+++ b/lldb/include/lldb/Core/EmulateInstruction.h
@@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ class EmulateInstruction : public PluginInterface {
                                         const RegisterInfo *reg_info,
                                         const RegisterValue &reg_value);
 
-  // Type to represent the condition of an instruction. The UINT32 value is
-  // reserved for the unconditional case and all other value can be used in an
+  // Type to represent the condition of an instruction. The UINT32_MAX value is
+  // reserved for the unconditional case and all other values can be used in an
   // architecture dependent way.
   typedef uint32_t InstructionCondition;
   static const InstructionCondition UnconditionalCondition = UINT32_MAX;

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168339


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list