[Lldb-commits] [clang] [lldb] [Clang] Introduce OverflowBehaviorType for fine-grained overflow control (PR #148914)

[Justin Stitt via lldb-commits]

JustinStitt wrote:

> Just to be clear, that's going to impact things like function overloading (which we support in C as well as C++), type inspection via `_Generic`, template type deduction in C++, etc. That's not an argument for or against anything, just a reminder that making these truly distinct types means more things to think about.

To chime in here, my current implementation supports overloading, templating + specialization and `_Generic`. I think @rjmccall is suggesting we scale that support back. Which reminds me, I think we discussed some edge cases at the dev meeting that I should add tests for.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148914