[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb] Add try_lock to SBMutex (PR #164109)

[Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-commits]

================
@@ -58,3 +58,12 @@ void SBMutex::unlock() const {
   if (m_opaque_sp)
     m_opaque_sp->unlock();
 }
+
+bool SBMutex::try_lock() const {
+  LLDB_INSTRUMENT_VA(this);
+
+  if (m_opaque_sp)
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:

Yes, you're right. If that's the case then I don't think the pointer can be null. Doesn't look like we do this in SBTarget either, but we could update the classes where that's the case to have an assert, but that would be a bigger change.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164109