[Lldb-commits] [clang] [lldb] [Clang] Introduce OverflowBehaviorType for fine-grained overflow control (PR #148914)

[Justin Stitt via lldb-commits]

JustinStitt wrote:

> Would it be reasonable to split this into two phases?

I think two phases is a good idea. This lets us get OBTs sooner and design __strict separately.

Does anyone know WG14s consensus over strong typedefs? __strict is similar enough that I'm curious to know what folks thought about them.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148914