[Lldb-commits] [lldb] e391301 - [lldb] Use `proc` instead of `pro` to avoid command ambiguity

[Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-commits]

Author: Jonas Devlieghere
Date: 2025-06-23T10:35:48-07:00
New Revision: e391301e0e4d9183fe06e69602e87b0bc889aeda

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e391301e0e4d9183fe06e69602e87b0bc889aeda
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e391301e0e4d9183fe06e69602e87b0bc889aeda.diff

LOG: [lldb] Use `proc` instead of `pro` to avoid command ambiguity

Use `proc` instead of `pro` to avoid ambiguity between the `process` and
`protocol-server` command.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    lldb/test/API/functionalities/unwind/sigtramp/TestSigtrampUnwind.py

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/lldb/test/API/functionalities/unwind/sigtramp/TestSigtrampUnwind.py b/lldb/test/API/functionalities/unwind/sigtramp/TestSigtrampUnwind.py
index 3476647a12ecb..4736d48151793 100644
--- a/lldb/test/API/functionalities/unwind/sigtramp/TestSigtrampUnwind.py
+++ b/lldb/test/API/functionalities/unwind/sigtramp/TestSigtrampUnwind.py
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ def test(self):
             )
 
         self.expect(
-            "pro handle  -n false -p true -s false SIGUSR1",
+            "proc handle  -n false -p true -s false SIGUSR1",
             "Have lldb pass SIGUSR1 signals",
             substrs=["SIGUSR1", "true", "false", "false"],
         )