[Lldb-commits] [lldb] [lldb-dap] Prevent using an implicit `step-in`. (PR #143644)

[Ebuka Ezike via lldb-commits]

da-viper wrote:

It is the combination of the first and third. 
For completness.

we do an step-over, which lands us at an instruction, which happens to be the first instruction of an inlined function.
 lldb-dap takes the PC value and resolves it to a function/block on its own. This returns the inlined function line entry (because the resolving function tries to be as accurate as possible). 

This only happens in lldb-dap not lldb. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143644